Key result
Ambulatory blood pressure, particularly daytime measurements, is superior to casual clinic blood pressure for predicting cardiovascular mortality in the general population.
Why the study?
Does ambulatory blood pressure monitoring improve the prediction of mortality compared to casual/clinic blood pressure measurement in the general population?
Does ambulatory blood pressure monitoring improve the prediction of mortality compared to casual/clinic blood pressure measurement in the general population?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, particularly daytime measurements, is superior to clinic blood pressure for predicting mortality and identifying white-coat hypertension.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yutaka Imai (1999) conducted a review in Hypertension. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring vs. Casual/clinic blood pressure was evaluated on Mortality. Ambulatory blood pressure, particularly daytime measurements, is superior to casual clinic blood pressure for predicting cardiovascular mortality in the general population.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: