Key result
Among nonobese individuals, central fat distribution combined with low lean mass was associated with higher log-transformed cfPWV compared to noncentral fat and low lean mass.
Why the study?
Is central fat distribution combined with low lean mass associated with higher aortic stiffness in nonobese individuals without cardiovascular disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=136)
Is central fat distribution combined with low lean mass associated with higher aortic stiffness in nonobese individuals without cardiovascular disease?
In nonobese individuals without cardiovascular disease, the combination of central fat distribution and low lean mass is associated with increased aortic stiffness, suggesting higher cardiovascular risk despite normal weight.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May flag higher CV risk in nonobese adults; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Subjects with normal body mass index but high body fat percentage have higher cardiovascular risk than subjects with normal weight and low fat mass. However, the association of fat distribution and lean mass with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) among nonobese apparently healthy individuals has never been assessed. METHODS: In 136 nonobese volunteers (mean age = 45±9 years; 57% women) without manifest cardiovascular disease, cfPWV was measured by applanation tonometry. Fat and lean mass were measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, total fat (r = 0.17; P < 0.01), trunk fat (r = 0.27; P < 0.01), and trunk/total fat ratio (r = 0.32; P < 0.01) were correlated with cfPWV. After adjustment for age and mean arterial pressure, only central fat distribution (trunk/total fat ratio) was significantly associated with cfPWV. In the fully adjustment model, there was a significant interaction between fat distribution and lean mass. When the study sample was grouped by fat distribution and total lean mass medians, subjects with central fat distribution and low lean mass (group 4) had higher log-transformed cfPWV than the noncentral fat/low lean mass group (group 2) (0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.86-0.92 vs. 0.85, 95% CI = 0.83-0.87; P < 0.01) or the noncentral fat/high lean mass group (group 1) (0.89, 95% CI = 0.86-0.92 vs. 0.84, 95% CI = 0.81-0.87; P < 0.01) after adjustments. Aortic stiffness increased from group 1 to group 4 (P for linear trend < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among normal weight individuals without manifest cardiovascular disease, the combination of central fat distribution and low lean mass is associated with higher cfPWV. These factors are more closely related to cfPWV than total fat mass.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wohlfahrt et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Nonobese without manifest cardiovascular disease (n=136). Central fat distribution and low lean mass vs. Noncentral fat distribution with high or low lean mass was evaluated on log-transformed carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) (p=< 0.01). Among nonobese individuals, central fat distribution combined with low lean mass was associated with higher log-transformed cfPWV compared to noncentral fat and low lean mass.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: