Key result
Cardiorespiratory fitness was inversely associated with aortic stiffness, but this association was no longer significant after adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors.
Why the study?
Is cardiorespiratory fitness associated with aortic stiffness in women with central obesity?
Cross-Sectional (n=87)
Is cardiorespiratory fitness associated with aortic stiffness in women with central obesity?
Higher cardiorespiratory fitness is inversely associated with aortic stiffness in centrally obese women, but this relationship appears to be mediated by traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Association attenuated by risk factors; leaves open whether fitness independently affects aortic stiffness in obese women.
PURPOSE: To examine the association between cardiorespiratory fitness and aortic stiffness in women with central obesity. The secondary purpose was to examine whether traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors mediate the relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness and aortic stiffness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-seven centrally obese women (age, 42 ± 9 years, [body mass index (BMI)] 28 ± 3 kg/m(2)) participated in this cross-sectional study. Central obesity was defined as a waist circumference >85 cm. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) was obtained from the carotid and femoral pulse sites using applanation tonometry to measure aortic stiffness. Maximal aerobic capacity (VO2 Max) was estimated using a submaximal walk test and taken as a measure of cardiorespiratory fitness. Potential correlates of both cardiorespiratory fitness and aortic stiffness examined in this study included the following: triglycerides (TG), C-reactive protein (CRP), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR), and pulsatile load (i.e., heart rate × aortic pulse pressure [aPP]). RESULTS: Pearson's bivariate correlations indicated that estimated VO2 Max was inversely associated with PWV (r = -0.330, p < 0.05). Using hierarchical multiple regression, the association between estimated VO2 Max and PWV was no longer significant after controlling for traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors, age, BMI, TG, CRP, HOMA-IR, and pulsatile load (β = 0.121, p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In centrally obese women, cardiorespiratory fitness was inversely associated with aortic stiffness. Associations were not independent of traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. This suggests that higher levels of cardiorespiratory fitness may indirectly reduce aortic stiffness through its beneficial effects on traditional and nontraditional CVD risk factors in women with central obesity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Augustine et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Central obesity (n=87). Cardiorespiratory fitness was evaluated on Aortic stiffness (Pulse wave velocity) (r = -0.330, p=<0.05). Cardiorespiratory fitness was inversely associated with aortic stiffness, but this association was no longer significant after adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: