Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The authors use a very simple sol-gel spin coating method at 900°C and 1min rapid thermal annealing to fabricate three different poly-Si-oxide-nitride-oxide-silicon-type flash memories. The memory windows estimated from the curve of drain current versus applied gate voltage are 3, 3.3, and 4V for (i) HfO2 thin film, (ii) hafnium silicate nanocrystal, and (iii) coexisted hafnium silicate and zirconium silicate nanocrystal memory, respectively. Together with the measurement from gate disturbance and drain disturbance on these fabricated devices, the coexisted nanocrystal devices exhibit better reliability than both the thin film type memory and single nanocrystal type memory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
You et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: