Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
As stated by Jean-Pierre Changeux (2004 Changeux, J -P. 2004. The physiology of truth, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]) in his last book, The Physiology of Truth, objective knowledge does exist, and our brains are naturally equipped to recognise it. The results presented here provide the first insights on (1) the cerebral basis of reasoning errors, and (2) the neurocognitive dynamics that lead the human brain towards logical truth. We propose to call this new approach “neuropedagogy of reasoning”.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olivier Houdé (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: