Key result
An AVCT-based rate-responsive pacemaker requires a closed-loop system design where controller gain depends on the therapeutic pacing frequency range and bandwidth is smaller than respiratory frequency.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The study provides theoretical and experimental design rules for developing a closed-loop rate-responsive pacemaker using atrio-ventricular conduction time as a sensor.
Chronotropic incompetent patients are unable to adapt their heart rate adequately to the level of exertion. One treatment for this disease is a rate-responsive pacemaker that stimulates the heart at a rate proportional to an exertion-related variable derived from an implemented sensor (e.g., ventilation). The atrio-ventricular conduction time (AVCT), which can act as such a sensor, corresponds to a well-defined interval in the intracardial electrogram. The AVCT is coupled to the sympathetic/parasympathetic activity of the autonomous nervous system (dromotropic effect), leading to a shortening of AVCT during exercise. We found that AVCT is also sensitive to the pacing frequency (pf). Hence, an AVCT-based pacemaker always constitutes a closed-loop system. General design rules for an AVCT pacemaker have been developed from our experimental results and a system-theoretical treatment with reasonable assumptions. Problems addressed were uncertainties concerning the AVCT dynamics and disturbances in the signal. The following rules for the controller design have been derived: 1) The controller gain strongly depends on the therapeutic range of the pf, which is set by the medical doctor; 2) the closed-loop bandwidth of the system should be smaller than the respiratory frequency; and 3) a robust control strategy, capable of guaranteeing stability for a certain set of plant models, should be applied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hexamer et al. (2002) studied Chronotropic incompetence. AVCT-based rate-responsive pacemaker was evaluated on Controller design rules. An AVCT-based rate-responsive pacemaker requires a closed-loop system design where controller gain depends on the therapeutic pacing frequency range and bandwidth is smaller than respiratory frequency.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: