Key result
Aortography identified aortic valve prolapse in 18 of 98 patients with ventricular septal defects, whereas cross-sectional echocardiography was insensitive for mild prolapse, detecting only 8 cases.
Why the study?
Does cross-sectional echocardiography accurately detect aortic valve prolapse compared to aortography in patients with ventricular septal defect?
Observational (n=98)
No
Does cross-sectional echocardiography accurately detect aortic valve prolapse compared to aortography in patients with ventricular septal defect?
Aortography is more sensitive than cross-sectional echocardiography for detecting mild aortic valve prolapse in patients with ventricular septal defects, which may explain spontaneous decreases in left-to-right shunting.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Negative echocardiography should not definitively rule out mild aortic valve prolapse in VSD; leaves open.
Angiographic criteria for the recognition of aortic valve prolapse in isolated ventricular septal defect were based on the degree of aortic cusp deformity and the presence or absence of aortic regurgitation. Ninety eight consecutive patients with isolated perimembranous or infundibular ventricular septal defects who were catheterised and had aortography performed were reviewed. They included five with postoperative ventricular septal defects and three with additional mild right ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Eighteen were found to have aortic valve prolapse. Although eight of the 18 were noted to have aortic regurgitation angiographically, only three had an early diastolic murmur. Only eight of the 18 patients had cross sectional echocardiographic findings suggestive of prolapse. All of these had at least moderate prolapse angiographically. Cross sectional echocardiography was found to be insensitive in diagnosing mild degrees of aortic valve prolapse. A trend towards a decreasing left to right shunt was noted as the degree of aortic valve prolapse increased. Spontaneous decrease in the size of a ventricular septal defect may be due to unrecognised aortic valve prolapse without clinical evidence of aortic regurgitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Menahem et al. (1986) conducted an observational in Ventricular septal defect (n=98). Aortic valve prolapse vs. No aortic valve prolapse was evaluated on Detection of aortic valve prolapse. Aortography identified aortic valve prolapse in 18 of 98 patients with ventricular septal defects, whereas cross-sectional echocardiography was insensitive for mild prolapse, detecting only 8 cases.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: