This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Syngas fermentation is used industrially to produce diluted bioethanol (about 1–6 wt%). This research study proposes a novel downstream process that recovers bioethanol in an energy-efficient and cost-effective manner, improves fermentation yield by recycling all fermentation broth components (microbes, acetate and water), and is designed for full-scale industrial-level application. Therefore, vacuum distillation at fermentation temperature was conceptually studied as an initial ethanol recovery step, leading to a bottom stream that may be recycled. Advanced separation and purification techniques were designed to recover 99.5% of initially present ethanol as high-purity product (99.8 wt%). Mechanical vapor recompression and heat integration methods were used to maximize sustainability and eco-efficiency of the proposed recovery process. Implementation of these techniques on a process using 6 wt% ethanol feed stream decreased the total annual costs by 54.2% (from 0.175 to 0.080 $/kgEtOH), reduced the primary energy requirement by 66.1% (from 2.82 to 0.96 kWthh/kgEtOH), lowered the CO2 emission by up to 82.6% (from 0.414 to 0.072 kgCO2/kgEtOH), and reduced the fresh water usage by 62.6% (from 0.242 to 0.091 m3W/kgEtOH). Sensitivity analysis for ethanol concentrations ranging from 6 to 1 wt% showed that the recovery costs and energy use increased to 0.336 $/kgEtOH and 1.78 kWthh/kgEtOH respectively. Since ethanol recovery performs better but fermentation will perform worse at higher ethanol concentration in fermentation broth, there is a trade-off concentration for the overall process. The current analysis is an important step toward determining this trade-off.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janković et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: