Key result
Slow stroking evoked more pleasant sensations than rhythmic touching, but both similarly decreased heart rate and increased parasympathetic activity compared to attention.
Why the study?
The authors intended to describe psychological and tonic physiological changes evoked by slow stroking, and explore associations with trait-like characteristics and pleasantness of skin sensation.
Does slow stroking evoke different psychological and physiological responses compared to rhythmic touching in young individuals?
Does slow stroking evoke different psychological and physiological responses compared to rhythmic touching in young individuals?
Although rhythmic touching is experienced as less pleasant than slow stroking, it has a comparable relaxing parasympathetic effect on cardiac activity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Slow stroking may heighten pleasantness without distinct autonomic effects versus rhythmic touch; leaves open associations with personality or body awareness.
Stimulation of C-tactile afferents with gentle slow stroking of the hairy skin, also called affective touch, evokes a pleasant sensation. We intended to describe psychological and tonic physiological changes evoked by slow stroking, as well as associations between pleasantness of skin sensation and physiological changes and trait-like self-reported characteristics (i.e., the major dimensions of personality and various aspects of body awareness). To shed more light on the factors involved in the effects of slow stroking, stroking (5 cm/sec) for 3 minutes was compared to skin-focused attention and gentle rhythmic touching of the skin. 85 young individuals participated in an experiment. Sensory characteristics of the stimulation (pleasantness, intensity) and physiological changes (HR, HF, RMSSD, respiratory rate, SCL) were assessed during the stimulation periods. The most pleasant and intense skin sensations were reported in the slow stroking condition, followed by the rhythmic touching and attention condition. Slow stroking and rhythmic touching significantly decreased HR and increased HF, RMSSD, respiratory rate, and SCL compared to baseline and the attention condition. Pleasantness of the sensation in the slow stroking condition was largely independent from the evoked physiological changes and from the assessed trait-like characteristics; Bayesian analysis indicated the superiority of null hypothesis (i.e. lack of associations) for almost all cases. Although rhythmic touching is experienced as less pleasant and intense, it has a relaxing (parasympathetic) effect on cardiac activity that is comparable with the effect of slow stroking. Characteristics of the evoked skin sensation are not related to major dimensions of personality and body awareness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Köteles et al. (2024) studied this question. Slow stroking vs. Skin-focused attention and gentle rhythmic touching was evaluated on Sensory characteristics (pleasantness, intensity) and physiological changes (HR, HF, RMSSD, respiratory rate, SCL). Slow stroking evoked more pleasant sensations than rhythmic touching, but both similarly decreased heart rate and increased parasympathetic activity compared to attention.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: