Demand for system-on-chip solutions has increased the interest in low drop-out (LDO) voltage regulators which do not require a bulky off-chip capacitor to achieve stability, also called capacitor-less LDO (CL-LDO) regulators. Several architectures have been proposed; however comparing these reported architectures proves difficult, as each has a distinct process technology and specifications. This paper compares CL-LDOs in a unified matter. We designed, fabricated, and tested five illustrative CL-LDO regulator topologies under common design conditions using 0.6?m CMOS technology. We compare the architectures in terms of (1) line/load regulation, (2) power supply rejection, (3) line/load transient, (4) total on-chip compensation capacitance, (5) noise, and (6) quiescent power consumption. Insights on what optimal topology to choose to meet particular LDO specifications are provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Torres et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: