Key result
Local anaesthesia with conscious sedation achieved a 100% procedural success rate with 0% perioperative mortality and no need for conversion to general anaesthesia during complex and noncomplex cardiac device procedures.
Why the study?
Does continuous combined intravenous conscious sedation with local anaesthesia provide a safe and feasible approach for patients undergoing complex and noncomplex cardiac implantable electronic device procedures?
Observational (n=279)
No
Does continuous combined intravenous conscious sedation with local anaesthesia provide a safe and feasible approach for patients undergoing complex and noncomplex cardiac implantable electronic device procedures?
Local anaesthesia with continuous intravenous conscious sedation is a safe and highly successful strategy for both complex and noncomplex cardiac device implantations, avoiding the need for general anaesthesia.
Conscious sedation may offer a feasible alternative for device procedures; leaves open need for randomized trials before practice change.
We assessed the feasibility and safety of using local anaesthesia with conscious sedation as an alternative to general anaesthesia during complex and noncomplex cardiac implantable device procedures. We enrolled 279 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac device implantation/replacement at our tertiary/quaternary cardiac specialist hospital during a 17-month study period. Continuous combined intravenous conscious sedation with propofol and midazolam plus fentanyl and local anaesthesia were used for all procedures. Among the patients, 113, 59, 43, and 64 patients underwent pacemaker implantation, implantable cardiac defibrillator implantation, cardiac resynchronisation therapy device implantation, and generator exchange, respectively. The procedural success rate was 100%, with no apnoea or hypoxia episodes requiring therapeutic intervention. None of the patients required conversion to general anaesthesia. The mean surgical duration was longer for complex vs. noncomplex procedures (p = 0.003). The minimum mean arterial pressure during complex procedures was slightly lower than that during noncomplex procedures (p = 0.03). The perioperative (<24 h) mortality rate was 0%, and neither complexity group required tracheal intubation. Only two patients (0.7%) required unplanned intensive care unit admission for further surveillance. Our findings suggest that local anaesthesia with conscious sedation is a safe and feasible option for cardiac device implantation procedures, including complex procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaya et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures (n=279). Local anaesthesia with conscious sedation was evaluated on Procedural success rate. Local anaesthesia with conscious sedation achieved a 100% procedural success rate with 0% perioperative mortality and no need for conversion to general anaesthesia during complex and noncomplex cardiac device procedures.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: