Key result
Frailty was present in 48.0% of patients with acute coronary syndrome but was not associated with prognostic markers or metabolic changes (p > 0.05).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate frailty and its relationship with prognostic markers in hospitalized patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Does frailty affect prognostic markers in hospitalized patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Cross-Sectional (n=125)
No
Does frailty affect prognostic markers in hospitalized patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Frailty is highly prevalent in older adults with acute coronary syndrome but does not appear to be associated with short-term prognostic markers or hospital outcomes in this cohort.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Frailty unrelated to prognostic markers in this ACS cohort; leaves open whether routine frailty screening refines risk stratification beyond existing tools.
Objective: To evaluate frailty and its relationship with prognostic markers in hospitalized patients with acute coronary syndrome. Methods: This cross-sectional study with a prospective variable analysis (prognostic markers) involved adults of both sexes aged ≥ 50 years with acute coronary syndrome. Patients with ≥ 3 of the following criteria were considered frail: 1) unintentional weight loss; 2) exhaustion (assessed by self-reported fatigue); 3) low handgrip strength; 4) low physical activity level; and 5) low gait speed. The included prognostic markers were: metabolic changes (lipid and glycemic profile), changes in inflammatory status (C-reactive protein), thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score, troponin level, angioplasty or surgery, hospitalization in the intensive care unit, length of hospital stay, and hospital outcome. Results: The sample consisted of 125 patients, whose mean age was 65.5 (SD, 8.7) years. The prevalence of frailty was 48.00%, which was higher in women (PR = 1.55; 95%CI 1.08– 2.22; p = 0.018) and patients with systemic arterial hypertension (PR = 2.18; 95%CI 1.01–5.24; p = 0.030). Frailty was not associated with age, cardiac diagnosis, or prognostic markers (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Frailty was highly prevalent in patients with acute coronary syndrome, affecting almost half of the sample, particularly women and patients with hypertension, irrespective of age. However, despite its high prevalence, frailty was not associated with markers of metabolic change or poor prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in acute coronary syndrome (n=125). Frailty vs. Non-frail patients was evaluated on Prognostic markers (metabolic changes, inflammatory status, TIMI risk score, troponin level, angioplasty or surgery, ICU hospitalization, length of stay, and hospital outcome) (p=>0.05). Frailty was present in 48.0% of patients with acute coronary syndrome but was not associated with prognostic markers or metabolic changes (p > 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: