Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a high-throughput sequencing panel for the diagnosis of developmental and epileptic encephalopathy in Tunisia and to clarify the frequency of disease-causing genes in this region. METHODS: We developed a custom panel for next-generation sequencing of the coding sequences of 116 genes in individuals with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy from the Tunisian population. Segregation analyses and in silico studies have been conducted to assess the identified variants' pathogenicity. RESULTS: We report 12 pathogenic variants in SCN1A, CHD2, CDKL5, SZT2, KCNT1, GNAO1, PCDH19, MECP2, GRIN2A, and SYNGAP1 in patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. Five of these variants are novel: "c.149delA, p.(Asn50MetfsTer26)" in CDKL5; "c.3616C > T, p.(Arg1206Ter)" in SZT2; "c.111_113del, p.(Leu39del)" in GNAO1; "c.1435G>C, p.(Asp479His)" in PCDH19; and "c.2143delC, p.(Arg716GlyfsTer10)" in SYNGAP1. Additionally, for four of our patients, the genetic result facilitated the choice of the appropriate treatment. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first report of a custom gene panel to identify genetic variants implicated in developmental and epileptic encephalopathy in the Tunisian population as well as the North African region (Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Morocco) with a diagnostic rate of 30%. This high-throughput sequencing panel has considerably improved the rate of positive diagnosis of developmental and epileptic encephalopathy in the Tunisian population, which was less than 15% using Sanger sequencing. The benefit of genetic testing in these patients was approved by both physicians and parents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saïd et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: