Key result
Macitentan significantly reduced pulmonary vascular resistance vs placebo in patients with persistent PH after LVAD implantation (geometric mean ratio 0.74; 95% CI 0.58-0.94; p=0.0158).
Why the study?
Macitentan is approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension, but its efficacy and safety in patients with persistent pulmonary hypertension following left ventricular assist device implantation had not been evaluated.
Does macitentan reduce pulmonary vascular resistance in patients with persistent pulmonary hypertension following LVAD implantation?
RCT (n=57)
Double-blind
1:1
Yes
Does macitentan reduce pulmonary vascular resistance in patients with persistent pulmonary hypertension following LVAD implantation?
Macitentan significantly reduces pulmonary vascular resistance in patients with persistent pulmonary hypertension following LVAD implantation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Macitentan reduced PVR in post-LVAD PH; hypothesis-generating for clinical benefit, requiring larger trials before practice change.
Macitentan is a dual endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) approved for treating pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). SOPRANO evaluated the efficacy and safety of macitentan versus placebo in pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. SOPRANO was a phase 2, multicenter, double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study. Patients with an LVAD implanted within the prior 90 days who had persistent PH (i.e., mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥25 mmHg, pulmonary artery wedge pressure [PAWP] ≤18 mmHg, and pulmonary vascular resistance [PVR] >3 Wood units [WU]) were randomized (1:1) to macitentan 10 mg or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in PVR. Secondary endpoints included change in right‐heart catheterization hemodynamic variables, N‐terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide levels, World Health Organization functional class, and safety/tolerability. Fifty‐seven patients were randomized to macitentan (n = 28) or placebo (n = 29). A statistically significant reduction in PVR from baseline to Week 12 was observed with macitentan versus placebo (placebo‐corrected geometric mean ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.58–0.94; p = .0158). No statistically significant differences were observed in secondary endpoints. In a post‐hoc analysis, 66.7% of patients receiving macitentan achieved PVR <3 WU versus 40.0% receiving placebo (p = .0383). Macitentan was generally well tolerated; adverse events were consistent with those in previous PAH studies with macitentan. In conclusion, macitentan showed promising tolerability and significantly reduced PVR in PH patients with persistently elevated PVR after LVAD implantation. ClinicalTrials. gov identifier: NCT02554903.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frantz et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Pulmonary hypertension following left ventricular assist device implantation (n=57). Macitentan vs. Placebo was evaluated on Change in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (geometric mean ratio 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.94, p=0.0158). Macitentan significantly reduced pulmonary vascular resistance vs placebo in patients with persistent PH after LVAD implantation (geometric mean ratio 0.74; 95% CI 0.58-0.94; p=0.0158).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: