Key result
Macitentan therapy for 12 months significantly improved the mean 6-minute walk distance from 331.65 m to 436.65 m (P < 0.0001) in Indian patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Why the study?
Although macitentan has demonstrated effectiveness and safety in randomized trials, clinical and echocardiographic progression with macitentan in Indian patients with PAH required evaluation.
Does macitentan improve clinical and echocardiographic parameters in Indian patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Cohort (n=20)
No
Does macitentan improve clinical and echocardiographic parameters in Indian patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Absolute Event Rate: 436.65% vs 331.65%
p-value: p=<0.0001
In a real-world Indian cohort, 12 months of macitentan therapy significantly improved functional class, exercise capacity, NT-pro-BNP levels, and echocardiographic parameters in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
May support macitentan in real-world Indian PAH; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: The effectiveness and safety of macitentan, an endothelin-receptor antagonist (ERA) in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), has been demonstrated in numerous randomized clinical trials including SERAPHIN, focused on the reduction of morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to demonstrate the clinical and echocardiographic progression using macitentan in Indian patients with PAH. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: It was a retrospective study of 20 patients with multiple etiologies of PAH who had begun macitentan in routine clinical practice from a single center. There were 55% of patients with existing PAH therapies. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The World Health Organization functional class (WHO-FC), 6-min walking distance, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide level (NT-pro-BNP), and echocardiographic data such as tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP), and the occurrence of pericardial effusion were collected at baseline and 12-month follow-up. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. RESULTS: Of the 20 PAH patients, 70% were women. The majority were in WHO FC II (50%), while 35% were in FC III and 15% were in FC IV. The mean age was 43.4 years at the start of the therapy with macitentan. After 6 months of macitentan therapy, 85% showed substantial improvement in their FC, each increased its 6-min walking distance test (P < 0.0001), and there was a significant reduction in plasma levels of NT-pro BNP (P < 0.0001). There has also been an improvement in echocardiographic parameters such as TAPSE and sPAP (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that macitentan has been well tolerated and beneficial in Indian patients with PAH and further, future research is required to verify these results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jariwala et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Pulmonary arterial hypertension (n=20). Macitentan vs. Baseline was evaluated on 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) (p=<0.0001). Macitentan therapy for 12 months significantly improved the mean 6-minute walk distance from 331.65 m to 436.65 m (P < 0.0001) in Indian patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: