Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: Autoantibodies to the Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 (FGFR3-AAbs) have been associated with idiopathic sensory-predominant neuropathy. The pathogenicity of FGFR3-AAbs in this disorder is unknown. Pathogenic mechanisms of autoantibodies in other dysimmune neuropathies commonly involve their direct binding to antigens on either neurons or glia. The expression of FGFR3 in the human peripheral nervous system is unknown. Therefore, as an initial step toward clarifying the pathogenicity of FGFR3-AAbs, we characterized the expression of FGFR3 in nerve (hNerve), dorsal root ganglia (hDRG) and spinal cord (hSC) in human. Methods: was assayed via in situ hybridization (ISH) on post-mortem sections of hNerve, hDRG and hSC, and by re-analysis of RNA-sequencing data from hDRG. FGFR3 protein was assayed in these tissues using capillary electrophoretic immunoassays (CEIA) with several validated anti-FGFR3 antibodies. Results: mRNA was not detected in hNerve or hDRG but was abundant in hSC by ISH. FGFR3 protein was absent from hNerve and hDRG by CEIA but was moderately expressed in hSC. Discussion: A direct pathogenic mechanism of FGFR3-AAbs in sensory neuropathy would require the expression of FGFR3 in either neurons or non-neuronal cells in nerve or DRG. Using multiple methods, we did not detect FGFR3 expression at the mRNA or protein levels in these tissues. Given the absence of FGFR3 from hNerve and hDRG, it is improbable that FGFR3-AAbs cause direct damage to the neural components involved in neuropathy and thus are unlikely to be pathogenic, although indirect mechanisms via non-neural cells cannot be excluded.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chamessian et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: