Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: Reviews of the brain retractor evolution are described. Instrument characteristics as well as the physiopathological and histopathological damage of the brain are induced by brain retraction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The literature related to the brain retractor was reviewed. Journals, books, personal testimony, government patents, and electronic media databases were analysed. RESULTS: The brain retractor started as a hand-held flat ribbon manufactured on copper and stainless steel. This shape evolved into a shovel. Several shapes acquired from the early period were from a tappered, spoon shape covered by silicone. The posterior evolution was the development of the articulate arm, fixed to the skull or to the self-retaining subcutaneous retractor, or attached to a frame or to a stereotactic instrument. The pressure monitor was the most important safety addition. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, a better monitor system needs to be developed to avoid brain injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dujovny et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: