Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We describe a technique for exposing patterns of spatial period p/n using near-field diffraction from masks of spatial period p. The technique, which we propose to call ’’spatial-period-division’’, can be used with visible, UV, or x-ray radiation. With soft x rays, it is possible to produce gratings of much finer spatial period than can be achieved by current laser holographic methods. A simple model predicts that a mask pattern of period p, with an opening or slit of width ?p/2n, will give rise to an intensity pattern of period p/n at a distance from the mask, S=p2/nλ, where λ is the wavelength of the incident radiation and l≪p. The model was confirmed at visible wavelengths using a scaled simulation of a laboratory x-ray lithography unit. The feasibility of the technique was demonstrated at the 4.5 nm carbon K x-ray wavelength by ’’doubling’’ a 196.8 nm period grating-pattern x-ray mask to produce a 98.4 nm period pattern in PMMA. Exposure of higher spatial-frequency-multiples appears feasible, especially with a synchrotron source. If the mask introduces a phase shift, such that the zero-order diffracted beam is cancelled, and if p<2λ, only the second spatial-frequency-multiple will be present. This should enable quasiperiodic patterns such as variable-period gratings and Fresnel zone plates to be ’’doubled’’.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Flanders et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: