Key result
Perioperative methylprednisolone in pediatric cardiac surgery decreases pro-inflammatory mediators but lacks consistent evidence for improving clinical outcomes, with potential risks in lower-risk patients.
Why the study?
Corticosteroids are used to decrease the inflammatory response to pediatric cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass, but sparse pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data and limited clinical outcome evidence lead to wide practice variation.
Does perioperative methylprednisolone improve clinical outcomes in children undergoing pediatric cardiac surgery?
Does perioperative methylprednisolone improve clinical outcomes in children undergoing pediatric cardiac surgery?
Current evidence for methylprednisolone in pediatric cardiac surgery is limited to surrogate inflammatory markers with insufficient data on clinical outcomes, necessitating adequately powered randomized trials.
Variability in corticosteroid concentrations and larger neonatal volume of distribution suggest age-specific dosing; extends sparse PK/PD data for perioperative use in pediatric cardiac surgery.
Corticosteroids have been used to decrease the inflammatory response to cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass in children for decades. Sparse information is present concerning the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of corticosteroids in the context of pediatric cardiac surgery. There is large interindividual variability in plasma concentrations, with indications for a larger volume of distribution in neonates compared to other age groups. There is ample evidence that perioperative use of MP leads to a decrease in pro-inflammatory mediators and an increase in anti-inflammatory mediators, with no difference in effect between doses of 2 and 30 mg/kg. No differences in inflammatory mediators have been shown between different times of administration relative to the start of surgery in various studies. MP has been shown to have a beneficial effect in certain subgroups of patients but is also associated with side effects. In lower risk categories, the balance between risk and benefit may be shifted toward risk. There is limited information on short- to medium-term outcome (mortality, low cardiac output syndrome, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the intensive care unit or the hospital), mostly from underpowered studies. No information on long-term outcome, such as neurodevelopmental outcome, is available. MP may provide a small benefit that is easily abolished by patient characteristics, surgical techniques, and perfusion management. The lack of evidence leads to large differences in practice between and within countries, and even within hospitals, so there is a need for adequately powered randomized studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saet et al. (2021) conducted a review in Pediatric cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Methylprednisolone vs. Placebo or no treatment was evaluated. Perioperative methylprednisolone in pediatric cardiac surgery decreases pro-inflammatory mediators but lacks consistent evidence for improving clinical outcomes, with potential risks in lower-risk patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: