Key result
Intraoperative methylprednisolone did not reduce the primary morbidity-mortality composite endpoint in neonates undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB compared to placebo.
Why the study?
The efficacy of intraoperative corticosteroids for improving outcomes following congenital cardiac surgery in neonates with cardiopulmonary bypass remains controversial.
Does a single intraoperative dose of intravenous methylprednisolone (30 mg/kg) reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality before hospital discharge in neonates undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass?
RCT (n=176)
Double-blind
1:1 permuted block randomization stratified by planned procedure (palliative or corrective) and surgeon
Yes
Does a single intraoperative dose of intravenous methylprednisolone (30 mg/kg) reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality before hospital discharge in neonates undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Routine intraoperative methylprednisolone did not significantly reduce overall postoperative morbidity and mortality in neonates undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass, though subgroup benefits in palliative surgeries and at one center suggest patient or center-specific factors modify steroid efficacy.
Background The efficacy of intraoperative corticosteroids to improve outcomes following congenital cardiac operations remains controversial. Objective To determine whether intraoperative methylprednisolone improves postoperative recovery in neonates undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods Neonates undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass at 2 centers were enrolled in a double-blind randomized controlled trial of methylprednisolone (30 mg/kg) or placebo after the induction of anesthesia. The primary outcome was a previously validated morbidity-mortality composite that included any of the following events following surgery before discharge: death, mechanical circulatory support, cardiac arrest, hepatic injury, renal injury, or rising lactate level (>5 mmol/L). Results Of the 190 subjects enrolled, 176 (n=81 methylprednisolone, n=95 placebo) were included in this analysis. A total of 27 (33%) subjects in the methylprednisolone group and 40 (42%) in the placebo group reached the primary study endpoint (OR=0.63; 95% CI, 0.31–1.3; p=0.21). Methylprednisolone was associated with reductions in vasoactive inotropic requirements and in the incidence of the composite endpoint in subjects undergoing palliative operations (OR=0.38; 95% CI 0.15–0.99; p=0.048). There was a significant interaction between treatment effect and center. In this analysis, methylprednisolone was protective at 1 center with an OR=0.35 (95% CI, 0.15–0.84; p=0.02) and not so at the other center with OR=5.13 (95% CI, 0.85–30.9; p=0.07). Conclusions Intraoperative methylprednisolone failed to show an overall significant benefit on the incidence of the composite primary study endpoint. There was, however, a benefit in patients undergoing palliative procedures and a significant interaction between treatment effect and center suggesting there may be center or patient characteristics which make prophylactic methylprednisolone beneficial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graham et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Neonates undergoing congenital cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (n=176). Methylprednisolone vs. Placebo was evaluated on Composite of death, mechanical circulatory support (ECMO), cardiac arrest, hepatic injury, renal injury, or rising lactate level (>5 mmol/L) before hospital discharge (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.31-1.3, p=0.21). Intraoperative methylprednisolone did not reduce the primary morbidity-mortality composite endpoint in neonates undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB compared to placebo.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: