Key result
High platelet FcɣRIIa levels predicted the composite of MI, stroke, and death in both PCI-treated (HR 2.57; 95% CI 1.41-4.69) and medically managed (HR 2.29; 95% CI 1.18-4.41) patients.
Why the study?
In patients with MI, quantifying pFCG stratifies subsequent ischemic risk, prompting this subgroup analysis evaluating outcomes according to treatment with PCI versus medical management alone.
Does high platelet FcɣRIIa predict the composite of MI, stroke, and death in patients treated with PCI or medical therapy alone after myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=800)
Yes
Does high platelet FcɣRIIa predict the composite of MI, stroke, and death in patients treated with PCI or medical therapy alone after myocardial infarction?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quantifying platelet FcɣRIIa provides prognostic information for subsequent cardiovascular events in MI patients, regardless of whether they receive PCI or medical therapy alone.
BACKGROUND: In patients with myocardial infarction (MI), quantifying platelet FcɣRIIa (pFCG) stratifies the risk of subsequent MI, stroke, and death. This report is a subgroup analysis of outcomes in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or medical management alone in an 800-patient, 25-center trial. METHODS: Patients were enrolled in a prospective, noninterventional trial during hospitalization for type 1 MI (ST-segment–elevation and non–ST-segment–elevation). Inclusion criteria included at least 2 of the following: aged ≥65 years, multivessel coronary artery disease, prior MI, chronic kidney disease, or diabetes. Flow cytometry was used to quantify pFCG at a core laboratory. High and low pFCG were defined by a prespecified threshold. The primary end point was the composite of MI, stroke, and death. RESULTS: Patients treated with medical therapy alone (n=151) had a greater occurrence of the primary end point (23.8%) than those treated with PCI (n=490, 8.8%). The pFCG test discriminated to a similar extent the risk of the primary end point in both the medical treatment group (hazard ratio, 2.29 [95% CI, 1.18–4.41]; P =0.014) and the PCI group (hazard ratio, 2.57 [95% CI, 1.41–4.69]; P =0.002). There was no significant association between pFCG and clinically relevant bleeding in the medical treatment group (hazard ratio, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.29–5.10]) or the PCI group (hazard ratio, 1.56 [95% CI, 0.67–3.61]). CONCLUSIONS: Quantifying pFCG discerned the risk of subsequent cardiovascular events among patients treated with medical therapy alone or PCI. This prognostic information will be useful for clinical decisions that balance ischemic and bleeding risk. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT05175261.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schneider et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Type 1 myocardial infarction (n=800). High platelet FcɣRIIa (pFCG) vs. Low platelet FcɣRIIa (pFCG) was evaluated on Composite of MI, stroke, and death (HR 2.57, 95% CI 1.41-4.69, p=0.002). High platelet FcɣRIIa levels predicted the composite of MI, stroke, and death in both PCI-treated (HR 2.57; 95% CI 1.41-4.69) and medically managed (HR 2.29; 95% CI 1.18-4.41) patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: