Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The taper-shaped monoesters of mono-3a, di-3c, tri-3d, and tetra-3f ethylene glycol with 3,4,5-tris(p-dodecyloxybenzyloxy)benzoic acid 1 and their corresponding polymethacrylates, 6a, b, c and d, respectively, self-assemble into a tubular supramolecular architecture displaying an enantiotropic columnar hexagonal (Φh) mesophase. Characterization of this supramolecular architecture by a combination of differential scanning calorimetry, wide- and small-angle X-ray scattering, thermal optical polarized microscopy, and molecular modelling suggests a model in which the stratum of the column is formed by in between 3.9 and 5.4 molecules of 3 or 4.5 and 5.9 repeat units of 6 with their oligo(oxyethylenic) segments melted and segregated in the centre of the column and their melted alkyl tails radiating towards the columns periphery. 2-(2-Methoxyethyl) 3,4,5-tris(p-dodecyloxybenzyloxy)benzoate 3b(the model compound of 3a in which the hydroxy group has been replaced by a methoxy group) is only crystalline, while bis(2-{2-[3,4,5-tris(p-dodecyloxybenzyloxy)benzoyloxy]ethoxy}ethyl) ether 3g(which is the dimer of 3c) displays a monotropic Φh phase. These results support that endo-recognition by H-bonding of the oligo(oxyethylenic)receptor of 3 and exo-recognition provided by the tapered 3,4,5-tris(p-dodecyloxybenzyloxy)benzoate fragment of 3(most probably functioning by hydrophobic–hydrophobic interactions) provide the driving force for the self-assembly of this tubular supramolecular architecture. In the case of the supramolecular architectures derived from 6, the H-bonding interaction is replaced by the poly(methacrylate) backbone which leads to a Φh mesophase that undergoes isotropization at temperatures that are 40 °C higher than those of 3. The channel penetrating the middle of the supramolecular cylinders derived from both 3 and 6 dissolves alkali-metal triflates and the ionic interaction generated by the dissolved ion-pairs enhances the thermal stability of their Φh phase. These results allowed for the first time a comparison between a ‘molecular’ polymer backbone effect (polymethacrylate) and a 'supramolecular' polymer backbone effect (generated by way of H-bonding and ionic interactions) to be made.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Percec et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: