Key result
Adenosine treatment reduced postischemic lactate dehydrogenase efflux from 24 to 9 IU/g and diastolic contracture from 21 to 5 mm Hg in mouse hearts subjected to ischemia.
Why the study?
Does adenosine protect against myocardial ischemic injury via transcriptional, translational, and mitochondrial KATP channel-dependent mechanisms in mouse hearts?
Does adenosine protect against myocardial ischemic injury via transcriptional, translational, and mitochondrial KATP channel-dependent mechanisms in mouse hearts?
Adenosine limits postischemic necrosis and contractile dysfunction via distinct signaling pathways involving mitochondrial KATP channel activation and protein translation, with contractile protection also involving mRNA transcription.
Should not change clinical practice; extends mechanistic evidence for adenosine's KATP and transcriptional pathways in mouse ischemia.
Adenosine protects against myocardial ischemic injury via poorly defined mechanisms. We examined effects of inhibition of gene transcription, mRNA translation, and mitochondrial KATP channels on cardioprotective effects of adenosine in mouse hearts subjected to 20‐min ischemia. Adenosine treatment reduced postischemic lactate dehydrogenase efflux (indicating necrosis) from 24±2 to 9±1 IU/g, and postischemic diastolic contracture from 21±2 to 5±2 mm Hg, and enhanced postischemic ventricular pressure development from 72±3 to 135±4 mm Hg. The antinecrotic response was reduced ≈50% by inhibition of protein translation (10 µM cycloheximide, CHX), unaltered by inhibition of transcription (20 µM actinomycin D, Act‐D), and abrogated by mitochondrial KATP channel inhibition (100 µM 5‐hydroxydecanoate, 5‐HD). In contrast, protection against contractile dysfunction was reduced but not eliminated by CHX, Act‐D, and 5‐HD, and inhibitory effects CHX and Act‐D were not additive with those of 5‐HD, supporting a common mechanistic path. Inhibitory effects of Act‐D were mimicked by 1.5 µM α‐amanitin. These data provide evidence that adenosine limits necrosis in a mito KATP channel‐dependent manner involving protein translation. The translational component is not dependent upon mRNA transcription. Adenosine also substantially reduces contractile dysfunction via a pathway involving mitochondrial KATP channel activation, protein translation, and mRNA transcription. Protection independent of this path was also evident. Thus, distinct signaling pathways appear to be involved in adenosine‐mediated protection against postischemic necrosis and contractile dysfunction. Drug Dev. Res. 58:454–460, 2003.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Headrick et al. (2003) studied myocardial ischemic injury. Adenosine vs. Control was evaluated on postischemic lactate dehydrogenase efflux. Adenosine treatment reduced postischemic lactate dehydrogenase efflux from 24 to 9 IU/g and diastolic contracture from 21 to 5 mm Hg in mouse hearts subjected to ischemia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: