Key result
The highest quartile of baseline d-dimer levels was associated with an increased risk of recurrent stroke compared to the lowest quartile (HR 7.29; 95% CI 2.59-20.52; P<0.001).
Why the study?
The study aimed to investigate the value of d-dimer levels in predicting recurrent stroke and evaluating its underlying causes in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source.
Do higher baseline d-dimer levels predict recurrent stroke in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source?
Cohort (n=1,431)
Do higher baseline d-dimer levels predict recurrent stroke in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source?
Elevated baseline d-dimer levels strongly predict the risk of recurrent stroke, particularly embolic ischemic stroke, in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source.
May aid recurrent stroke risk stratification in ESUS; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Background and Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the value of d-dimer levels in predicting recurrent stroke in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source. We also evaluated the underlying causes of recurrent stroke according to d-dimer levels. Methods: A total of 1431 patients with undetermined source were enrolled in this study and divided into quartiles according to their baseline plasma d-dimer levels. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of recurrent stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) in the year following the stroke event. Results: The risk of recurrent stroke increased significantly with the increasing d-dimer quartile (log-rank P=0.001). Patients in the higher d-dimer quartiles had a higher probability of recurrent embolic stroke because of covert atrial fibrillation, hidden malignancy, or undetermined sources. Most recurrent strokes in Q3 and Q4 were embolic but not in Q1 or Q2. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients in Q3 and Q4 had a significantly increased risk of recurrent stroke compared with those in Q1 (hazard ratio, 3.12 [95% CI, 1.07−9.07], P=0.036; hazard ratio, 7.29 [95% CI, 2.59−20.52], P<0.001, respectively; Ptrend<0.001). Binary analyses showed a significant association between a high d-dimer level above normal range and the risk of recurrent stroke (hazard ratio, 2.48 [95% CI, 1.31−4.70], P=0.005). In subgroup analyses, a high d-dimer level was associated with a significantly higher risk of recurrent stroke in men than in women (P=0.039). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that d-dimer levels can be a useful risk assessment biomarker for predicting recurrent stroke, especially embolic ischemic stroke, in patients with undetermined source.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Embolic stroke of undetermined source (n=1,431). Highest d-dimer quartile (Q4) vs. Lowest d-dimer quartile (Q1) was evaluated on Occurrence of recurrent stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) in the year following the stroke event (HR 7.29, 95% CI 2.59-20.52, p=<0.001). The highest quartile of baseline d-dimer levels was associated with an increased risk of recurrent stroke compared to the lowest quartile (HR 7.29; 95% CI 2.59-20.52; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: