Key result
Posterior mitral leaflet anatomical variations were not associated with residual mitral regurgitation ≥ 2+ following transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (18.8% vs 23.5%, p=0.988).
Why the study?
Little is known about how posterior mitral leaflet anatomical variation affects residual MR in TEER with the ValveClamp system in patients with DMR using 3D TEE.
Does posterior mitral leaflet anatomical variation affect residual mitral regurgitation after TEER with the ValveClamp system in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation?
Observational (n=55)
Does posterior mitral leaflet anatomical variation affect residual mitral regurgitation after TEER with the ValveClamp system in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation?
Posterior mitral leaflet variations are relatively common but do not significantly affect the occurrence of residual MR ≥ 2+ after TEER with the ValveClamp system, though patients with 4 scallops may have poorer clinical outcomes.
Posterior leaflet variations need not alter TEER selection; leaves open identification of other residual MR predictors.
Background Multiple studies illustrated that mitral valve (MV) leaflet presented variations, and there is little known about the posterior mitral leaflet (PML) anatomical variation affecting residual MR in interventional mitral valve edge-to-edge repair (TEER) with the ValveClamp system in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) using three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D TEE). Method Fifty-five DMR patients treated with TEER were included and performed 3D TEE pre- and post-procedure immediately. 3D TEE images were proceeded to characterize the posterior mitral leaflet anatomy and investigate the relationship between variations and residual mitral regurgitation (MR). Results Variations in PML were found in 16 patients (32%) of this series, including 3 cases (6%) of one scallop, 8 cases (16%) of two scallops, and 5 cases (10%) of four scallops. Residual MR ≥ 2+ were found in 3 patients with variant PML and 8 patients with classical PML post procedures, while other patients were all < 2+. The Chi-square test results showed no correlation between residual MR and PML variants (18.8% vs. 23.5, ᵪ 2 = 0, p = 0.988). Of the 5 patients with 4 scallops, 3 had poor clinical outcomes. Two patients were converted to surgical mitral valve repair and one died 1 month after implantation. Conclusions 3D TEE provides a novel and non-invasive method to characterize and classify PML variations. Variations in PML are relatively common and not associated with residual MR 2+.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) (n=55). Posterior mitral leaflet (PML) anatomical variation vs. Classical posterior mitral leaflet anatomy was evaluated on Residual mitral regurgitation (MR) ≥ 2+ (p=0.988). Posterior mitral leaflet anatomical variations were not associated with residual mitral regurgitation ≥ 2+ following transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (18.8% vs 23.5%, p=0.988).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: