Key result
The Cardiac Rehabilitation Adherence Tool demonstrated strong validity and reliability, with a 57-item structure explaining 45.23% of variance, Cronbach's alpha of 0.935, and test-retest r=0.95.
Why the study?
Patients with cardiac diseases achieve the greatest benefit from cardiac rehabilitation by modifying unhealthy behaviors, prompting the need to develop and evaluate a tool to assess rehabilitation adherence.
The newly developed Cardiac Rehabilitation Adherence Tool (CRAT) demonstrates strong validity and reliability for assessing patient adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CRAT may support adherence assessment in cardiac rehab; leaves open routine adoption pending prospective validation.
Patients with cardiac diseases can achieve the greatest benefit from cardiac rehabilitation through modification of their unhealthy behaviors. This study aimed to develop and examine the psychometric properties of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Adherence Tool (CRAT), which was designed to assess patients’ adherence to cardiac rehabilitation. In this instrument development study, the items of the CRAT were extracted through a comprehensive literature review. The CRAT was assessed in terms of validity and reliability. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to assess its construct validity, which led to the development of a tool containing 57 items and five dimensions including “acceptance of the rehabilitation center”, “being interested in health”, “feeling a need”, “personal control over the situation”, and “encouragement and advice.” These five factors accounted for 45.23% of the observed variance. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.935. The test-retest method supported the stability of the instrument (r = 0.95). Health care professionals can use the CRAT to examine factors influencing the patient’s decision to leave cardiac rehabilitation and design strategies for improving their adherence to the rehabilitation program.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hamedani et al. (2019) studied Cardiac diseases. Cardiac Rehabilitation Adherence Tool (CRAT) was evaluated on Psychometric properties (validity and reliability). The Cardiac Rehabilitation Adherence Tool demonstrated strong validity and reliability, with a 57-item structure explaining 45.23% of variance, Cronbach's alpha of 0.935, and test-retest r=0.95.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: