Why the study?
The impact of obesity on outcomes following minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) and multivessel MIDCAB (MV-MIDCAB) remains incompletely understood.
Population
383 patients undergoing MIDCAB or MV-MIDCAB with available BMI data (105 propensity score-matched pairs)
Comparison
Obese patients (BMI >= 30 kg/m2) vs non-obese patients (BMI < 30 kg/m2)
Design
Retrospective single-centre propensity score-matched analysis
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Propensity score-matched study reveals similar early outcomes across obese and non-obese patients undergoing minimally invasive coronary bypass, indicating obesity does not impair initial recovery.
Background: The impact of obesity on outcomes following minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) and multivessel MIDCAB (MV-MIDCAB) remains incompletely understood. Methods: This retrospective, single-centre analysis included 383 patients with available body mass index (BMI) data: 275 non-obese patients (BMI < 30 kg/m2) and 108 obese patients (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). Propensity score matching based on available preoperative covariates yielded 105 matched pairs. Baseline balance was assessed using standardized mean differences (SMDs). Results: Multivessel MIDCAB was performed in 41.9% of obese and 44.8% of non-obese patients (p = 0.755), while complete revascularization was achieved in 32.4% and 33.3%, respectively (p = 1.000). Acute kidney injury occurred in 6.7% of obese and 3.8% of non-obese patients (p = 0.549), while postoperative delirium occurred in 8.7% and 5.7%, respectively (p = 0.581). Wound infection was documented in 3 obese patients (2.9%) and 1 non-obese patient (1.0%; risk difference, 1.9 percentage points; approximate 95% confidence interval [CI], −1.8 to 5.7; exact paired p = 0.625). In-hospital mortality occurred in 1 obese patient and no non-obese patients (risk difference, 1.0 percentage point; approximate 95% CI, −0.9 to 2.8; exact paired p = 1.000). Conclusions: No statistically significant differences in early outcomes were detected.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ciobanu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: