Key result
In vitro testing of CARMAT total artificial heart surfaces demonstrated significantly lower platelet adhesion on pericardial tissue compared to positive controls (1.06 vs 2.87 10^9 cm^-2; P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Do the blood-contacting surfaces of the CARMAT total artificial heart (pericardial tissue and ePTFE) demonstrate in vitro haemocompatibility compared to silicone-coated controls?
Do the blood-contacting surfaces of the CARMAT total artificial heart (pericardial tissue and ePTFE) demonstrate in vitro haemocompatibility compared to silicone-coated controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.06% vs 2.87%
p-value: p=<0.0001
In vitro testing of the CARMAT total artificial heart blood-contacting surfaces demonstrated favorable haemocompatibility with limited platelet adhesion and thrombin generation.
OBJECTIVES: The CARMAT total artificial heart (TAH) is an implantable, electro-hydraulically driven, pulsatile flow device with four bioprosthetic valves. Its blood-pumping surfaces consist of processed bioprosthetic pericardial tissue and expanded polytetrafluorethylene (ePTFE), potentially allowing for the reduction of anti-coagulation. This pre-clinical study assessed the in vitro haemocompatibility of these surfaces. METHODS: Coupons of pericardial tissue and ePTFE were placed in closed tubular circuits filled with 12.5 ml of fresh human blood exposed to the pulsatile flow at 120 ml/min for 4 h (37°C). Silicone- and heparin-coated polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubes served as positive and negative controls, respectively. Fresh blood from six donors was used to fill four sets of 12 circuits. Blood samples were taken at baseline and from each circuit after 4 h. Coupons of materials were examined with scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: The platelet count was 202 ± 45 10(9) l(-1) at baseline. Four hours after circulation, the platelet counts were 161 ± 30 10(9) l(-1) (compared with baseline, P = 0.0207) for pericardial tissue, 162 ± 35 10(9) l(-1) (P = 0.0305) for ePTFE and 136 ± 42 10(9) l(-1) for positive controls (P = 0.0021). Baseline plasma fibrinogen was 2.9 ± 0.5 mg/dl compared with 3.0 ± 0.5 mg/dl for pericardial tissue and 3.1 ± 0.7 mg/dl for ePTFE, indicating no marked fibrinogen consumption. Thromboxane B2 levels for positive controls were 33.3 ± 8.7 ng/ml compared with 16.2 ± 11.5 ng/ml for pericardial tissue (P = 0.0015) and 15.2 ± 4.7 ng/ml for ePTFE (P < 0.0001). Platelet adhesion was 2.87 ± 1.01 10(9) cm(-2) for positive controls compared with 1.06 ± 0.73 10(9) cm(-2) for pericardial tissue (P < 0.0001) and 0.79 ± 0.75 10(9) cm(-2) for ePTFE (P < 0.0001). Thrombin-antithrombin III complex levels were 3.8 ± 0.5 μg/ml for positive controls compared with 1.9 ± 0.9 for pericardial tissue (P < 0.0001) and 2.1 ± 1.0 for ePTFE (P < 0.0001). With an electro-microscopic examination at ×600, only small depositions of platelets, erythrocytes and fibrin were noticed on the pericardial tissue samples and ePTFE samples. Silicone surfaces showed marked areas of thrombi, and PVC tubings a thin protein layer. CONCLUSIONS: Haemocompatibility of the TAH blood-contacting surfaces was confirmed by in vitro studies showing a limited consumption of fibrin, limited thromboxane B2 release and platelet adhesion, and minor blood cell depositions on the surfaces. These results will be validated in clinical studies, with the aim of reducing anti-coagulation when using the CARMAT TAH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jansen et al. (2012) studied this question. Pericardial tissue and ePTFE (CARMAT TAH surfaces) vs. Silicone- and heparin-coated polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubes was evaluated on Platelet adhesion (10^9 cm^-2) (p=<0.0001). In vitro testing of CARMAT total artificial heart surfaces demonstrated significantly lower platelet adhesion on pericardial tissue compared to positive controls (1.06 vs 2.87 10^9 cm^-2; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: