Key result
Anti-G-suit inflation significantly improved venous flow during +Gz stress in miniature swine (P<0.02), though progressive reductions in eye-level blood pressure occurred regardless of suit inflation.
Why the study?
Does anti-G-suit inflation improve hemodynamics in miniature swine during +Gz stress?
Does anti-G-suit inflation improve hemodynamics in miniature swine during +Gz stress?
p-value: p=<0.02
Anti-G-suit inflation improves venous flow during +Gz stress in miniature swine, primarily driven by an abdominal-to-central venous pressure gradient during relaxation between spontaneous straining maneuvers.
Nine unanesthetized, chronically instrumented, female miniature swine (MS) (avg wt, 39.7 kg) were exposed to head-to-tail inertial load (+Gz) levels of +3, +5, and +7 Gz for 60 s, with and without anti-G-suit inflation. Venous flow (VF) was measured by an electromagnetic flow sensor around the inferior thoracic vena cava at the diaphragm. Central venous pressure (CVP), abdominal venous pressure (AVP), eye-level blood pressure (ELBP), and esophageal pressure (EP) were also measured before, during, and after +Gz. There was a progressive significant decrease from control of both ELBP (P less than 0.001) and VF (P less than 0.05) during the three +Gz exposures, both with and without G-suit inflation. Without G-suit inflation, most of the MS were unable to tolerate +5 and +7 Gz. Although VF was significantly (P less than 0.02) improved by G-suit inflation during +Gz there was no significant difference in VF between the three +Gz levels, with or without G-suit inflation. The MS does a spontaneous straining maneuver (cyclic Valsalva) during +Gz with G-suit support. Using EP as a trigger, the data were grouped as strain or no strain (relaxation). A continuous AVP-to-CVP gradient existed during G-suit inflation, which increased dramatically during no strain with increasing +Gz, and was associated with an increase in VF. Thus, the majority of VF occurred during relaxation between strains, even though relaxation time was shortened as +Gz increased. Although ELBP is obviously dependent on cardiac output and venous return, the progressive reduction in ELBP with increased +Gz loads was not significantly related to changes in VF at the diaphragm which was maintained, although at a reduced rate, by the AVP-to-CVP gradient during G-suit inflation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burns et al. (1986) studied +Gz stress (n=9). Anti-G-suit inflation vs. Without anti-G-suit inflation was evaluated on Venous flow (VF) (p=<0.02). Anti-G-suit inflation significantly improved venous flow during +Gz stress in miniature swine (P<0.02), though progressive reductions in eye-level blood pressure occurred regardless of suit inflation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: