Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of ischaemic post-conditioning (IPostC) against ischaemia-reperfusion (IR) injury on bilateral testes after unilateral testicular ischaemia in the rat. Eight-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into control group; IR group (60 min ischaemia-24 h reperfusion); IPostC1 × 10 group (60 min ischaemia followed by one cycle of 10 sec reperfusion-10 sec ischaemia; then 24 h reperfusion); IPostC3 × 10 group (three cycles of 10 sec reperfusion-10 sec ischaemia; then 24 h reperfusion); IPostC5 × 10 group (five cycles of 10 sec reperfusion-10 sec ischaemia; then 24 h reperfusion) and IPostC3 × 30 group (three cycles of 30 sec reperfusion-30 sec ischaemia; then 24 h reperfusion). In the IR and IPostC groups, the right testicular vessels were clamped using a special vascular clip. Malondialdehyde (MDA) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) levels were measured in testicular tissue samples bilaterally. Additionally, bilateral testicular tissue samples were processed for histological evaluation including haematoxylin-eosin, 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (4-HNE) and TdT-mediated dUTP Nick End Labelling (TUNEL) staining. The levels of MDA and MPO as well as the positive cells per seminiferous tubule in TUNEL and 4-HNE stain in bilateral testes from the IR group were significantly higher compared with the control group. IPostC3 × 30 protocol significantly ameliorated the aforesaid parameters in both testes compared with the IR group. For the first time, we have demonstrated that IPostC protects both testes after unilateral testicular ischaemia-reperfusion. IPostC3 × 30 protocol offered the most effective protection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shimizu et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: