Key result
The Peguero-Lo Presti ECG criterion demonstrated a higher area under the curve (0.70) and sensitivity (51.9%) for diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy in older adults compared to Cornell voltage and Romhilt-Estes criteria.
Why the study?
The Peguero-Lo Presti criterion improved accuracy for diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy over traditional ECG criteria, but had been evaluated in few patients of advanced age.
Does the Peguero-Lo Presti (PLP) ECG criterion improve diagnostic accuracy for left ventricular hypertrophy compared to traditional ECG criteria in older adults?
Observational (n=592)
Blinded to echocardiogram and clinical analysis
No
Does the Peguero-Lo Presti (PLP) ECG criterion improve diagnostic accuracy for left ventricular hypertrophy compared to traditional ECG criteria in older adults?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.7% vs 0.66%
p-value: p=<0.05
The Peguero-Lo Presti ECG criterion offers superior diagnostic performance for left ventricular hypertrophy in older adults compared to traditional criteria, making it a useful tool to guide echocardiogram ordering in low-resource settings.
PLP accuracy in octogenarians needs prospective validation; leaves open superiority over CV or SL for LVH diagnosis in elderly.
Recently, a new ECG criterion, the Peguero-Lo Presti (PLP), improved overall accuracy in the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH)-compared to traditional ECG criteria, but with few patients with advanced age. We analyzed patients with older age and examined which ECG criteria would have better overall performance. A total of 592 patients were included (83.1% with hypertension, mean age of 77.5 years) and the PLP criterion was compared against Cornell voltage (CV), Sokolow-Lyon voltage (SL) and Romhilt-Estes criteria (cutoffs of 4 and 5 points, RE4 and RE5, respectively) using LVH defined by the echocardiogram as the gold standard. The PLP had higher AUC than the CV, RE and SL (respectively, 0.70 vs 0.66 vs 0.64 vs 0.67), increased sensitivity compared with the SL, CV and RE5 (respectively, 51.9% [95% CI 45.4-58.3%] vs 28.2% [95% CI 22.6-34.4%], p < 0.0001; vs 35.3% [95% CI 29.2-41.7%], p < 0.0001; vs 44.4% [95% CI 38.0-50.9%], p = 0.042), highest F1 score (58.3%) and net benefit for most of the 20-60% threshold range in the decision curve analysis. Overall, despite the best diagnostic performance in older patients, the PLP criterion cannot rule out LVH consistently but can potentially be used to guide clinical decision for echocardiogram ordering in low-resource settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tavares et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Left ventricular hypertrophy (n=592). Peguero-Lo Presti (PLP) criterion vs. Cornell voltage, Sokolow-Lyon voltage, and Romhilt-Estes criteria was evaluated on Area under the curve (AUC) for left ventricular hypertrophy diagnosis (95% CI 0.65-0.74, p=<0.05). The Peguero-Lo Presti ECG criterion demonstrated a higher area under the curve (0.70) and sensitivity (51.9%) for diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy in older adults compared to Cornell voltage and Romhilt-Estes criteria.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: