Key result
This review describes multiple single ventricle and biventricular management strategies for neonates and infants with critical left ventricular outflow tract obstruction based on unique anatomic findings.
This review describes therapeutic strategies for neonates with critical LVOTO based on unique physiologic and anatomic findings.
Anatomy-specific strategies may guide individualized neonatal critical LVOTO management; leaves open prospective trials to compare outcomes.
Despite being one of the most common congenital cardiac abnormalities, the treatment of critical left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) in the neonate and infant remains a significant challenge. Critical LVOTO in the neonate and infant includes continuous and diverse spectrum of anatomic diagnoses ranging from hypoplastic left heart complex to isolated aortic valvular stenosis with otherwise normally formed left heart structures. Depending on related anatomic features, there are multiple single ventricle and biventricular management strategies available for patients with critical LVOTO; all of which carry significant risk of death and requirement for future interventions. Because of the wide array of morphologic lesions and physiologic manifestations, application of the currently available published data to guide decision making in the individual patients can be challenging. Therefore, the aim of this review is to describe the different therapeutic strategies that can be applied to neonates presenting with critical LVOTO taking into consideration each patient's unique physiologic and anatomic findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alsoufi et al. (2007) conducted a review in Critical left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO). Single ventricle and biventricular management strategies was evaluated. This review describes multiple single ventricle and biventricular management strategies for neonates and infants with critical left ventricular outflow tract obstruction based on unique anatomic findings.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: