THE PRESENCE OF POSITIVE AFFECT during the encoding of a per suasive message results in a weaker effect of argument strength on attitudes than the presence of negative affect does; this pattern is reversed, however, when mood is present at judgment (Bless, Mackie , & Schwarz, 1992). These findings can both be explained by the notion that positive mood reduces systematic processing, whereas negativ e mood enhances it (Schwarz, Bless, & Bohner, 1991). Thus, the presence of positive mood during encoding should decrease message elaboration and thereby reduce the impact of argument strength on subsequent judgments (petty & Cacioppo, 1986). In contrast, positive mood during judgment should facilitate the recall of a simplified representation of the message, whereas negative mood during judgment should facilitate the recall of a detailed representation of the message. The former process is likely to result in more extreme judgments (LinviIIe & Jones, 1980); thus, judgments that are made in a positive mood should reflect argu ment strength to a greater degree than judgments that are made in a nega tive mood. In the present study we further explored the effects of mood on elabora tion and judgment, using a different persuasive message and two neutral mood control conditions. The subjects were 104 students at the University of Mannheim, Germany. The design was a 2 X 2 X 2 (Time of Mood Induction: exposure, judgment X Mood: happy, sad X Arguments: strong, weak) facto rial, plus two control conditions. To induce mood we asked the subjects in
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bohner et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: