Key result
Having 4 mismatched HLA-DR/DQ alleles or >40 eplet mismatches increased the risk of graft loss in heart transplant recipients (HR 1.17; 95% CI 1.07-1.28 and HR 1.11; 95% CI 1.03-1.21, respectively).
Why the study?
HLA matching is not routinely performed in heart transplantation, but novel allograft perfusion methods may make it feasible.
Does high HLA mismatch increase the risk of graft loss in heart transplant recipients?
Cohort (n=34,681)
Does high HLA mismatch increase the risk of graft loss in heart transplant recipients?
Hazard Ratio: 1.17 (95% CI 1.07–1.28)
High degrees of HLA mismatch, particularly in younger recipients, are associated with an increased risk of graft loss, suggesting a potential role for HLA-based risk stratification to guide post-transplant surveillance.
HLA-DR/DQ mismatch was associated with late graft loss; leaves open whether eplet matching improves risk stratification in prospective studies.
Background Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching isn't routinely performed in heart transplantation. Novel allograft perfusion methods may make HLA matching feasible. The purpose of this study is to reexamine whether HLA mismatch may be used in risk stratification to improve outcomes in heart transplantation. Methods and Results We analyzed 34 681 recipients undergoing heart transplantation between 1987 and 2013. We used HLAMatchmaker to quantify HLA eplet mismatches and Cox regression for analysis of time to graft loss. Recipients with 4 mismatched HLA-DR/DQ alleles and >40 eplets reached an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for graft loss of 1.17 (95% CI 1.07-1.28) and 1.11 (95% CI 1.03-1.21), respectively. We found significant interaction between recipient age and numbers of HLA-DR/DQ allele and eplet mismatches resulting in an adjusted HR of 1.78 (95% 1.13-2.80) and 1.82 (95% CI, 1.23-2.70), respectively. HR for both interaction terms was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00). Risk of graft loss was more pronounced after 1 year, where recipient <40 years with 4 mismatched HLA-DR/DQ alleles and >40 eplets had an adjusted HR of 1.51 (95% CI 1.12-2.03) and 1.32 (95% CI 1.02-1.70), respectively. Pre-sensitized recipients with panel reactive antibodies >10% had an adjusted HR=1.27 (95% CI 1.16-1.40) for graft loss within 1 year but not thereafter. HLA eplet mismatch was independent of panel reactive antibodies on reduction of graft loss within and after 1 year, P (interaction)=0.888 and 0.389. Conclusions HLA mismatch may be used in risk stratification for intensified post-transplant surveillance and therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nilsson et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Heart transplantation (n=34,681). HLA mismatch (HLA-DR/DQ alleles and eplets) vs. Fewer or no HLA mismatches was evaluated on Time to graft loss (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.07-1.28). Having 4 mismatched HLA-DR/DQ alleles or >40 eplet mismatches increased the risk of graft loss in heart transplant recipients (HR 1.17; 95% CI 1.07-1.28 and HR 1.11; 95% CI 1.03-1.21, respectively).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: