Key result
Low molecular weight heparin did not significantly reduce the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis compared to placebo in patients with isolated below-knee fractures (8.7% vs 12.6%; p=0.22).
Why the study?
Does low molecular weight heparin reduce the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis in patients with isolated fractures below the knee requiring operative fixation?
RCT (n=238)
Double-blind
Randomized
No
Does low molecular weight heparin reduce the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis in patients with isolated fractures below the knee requiring operative fixation?
In patients with isolated below-knee fractures requiring surgery, thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin did not significantly reduce the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis, although the trial was underpowered.
Does not support routine LMWH use after isolated below-knee fracture fixation; leaves open efficacy in larger powered trials.
The incidence of deep-vein thrombosis and the need for thromboprophylaxis following isolated trauma below the knee is uncertain. We have investigated this with a prospective randomised double-blind controlled trial using low molecular weight heparin with saline injection as placebo in patients aged between 18 and 75 years who had sustained an isolated fracture below the knee which required operative fixation. All patients had surgery within 48 hours of injury and were randomised to receive either the placebo or low molecular weight heparin for 14 days, after which they underwent bilateral lower limb venography, interpreted by three independent radiologists. Further follow-up was undertaken at two, six, eight and 12 weeks. A total of 238 patients fulfilled all the inclusion criteria, with 127 in the low molecular weight heparin group and 111 in the placebo group, all of whom underwent bilateral venography. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis between those patients treated with low molecular weight heparin or the placebo (p = 0.22). The number of deep-vein thromboses in the two groups was 11 (8.7%) and 14 (12.6%), respectively. Age and the type of fracture were significantly associated with the rate of deep-vein thrombosis (p = 0.001 and p = 0.009, respectively) but gender, comorbidities and the body mass index were not. The overall incidence of deep-vein thrombosis in this series was 11%. There was no clinical or statistical significant reduction in the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis with the use of thromboprophylaxis. However, we accept that owing to a cessation of funding, recruitment to this trial had to be ended prior to establishing the necessary sample size. Our results cannot, therefore, categorically exclude the possibility that low molecular weight heparin treatment could be beneficial. We recommend a further multicentre trial be undertaken to resolve this matter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goel et al. (2009) conducted an RCT in Isolated fracture below the knee (n=238). Low molecular weight heparin vs. Placebo (saline injection) was evaluated on Incidence of deep-vein thrombosis (p=0.22). Low molecular weight heparin did not significantly reduce the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis compared to placebo in patients with isolated below-knee fractures (8.7% vs 12.6%; p=0.22).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: