Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews of early rehabilitation within intensive care units have highlighted the need for robust multi-centre randomised controlled trials with longer term follow up. This trial aims to explore the feasibility of earlier and enhanced rehabilitation for patients mechanically ventilated for ≥5days and to assess the impact on possible long term outcome measures for use in a definitive trial. METHODS: Patients admitted to a large UK based intensive care unit and invasively ventilated for ≥5days were randomised to the rehabilitation intervention or standard care on a 1:1 basis, stratified by age and SOFA score. The rehabilitation intervention involved a structured programme, with progression along a functionally based mobility protocol according to set safety criteria. RESULTS: 103 out of 128 eligible patients were recruited into the trial, achieving an initial recruitment rate of 80%. Patients in the intervention arm mobilized significantly earlier (8days vs 10 days, p=0.035), at a more acute phase of illness (SOFA 6 vs 4, p<0.05) and reached a higher level of mobility at the point of critical care discharge (MMS 7 vs 5, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated the feasibility of introducing a structured programme of rehabilitation for patients admitted to critical care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McWilliams et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: