Comparative metabolomic study reveals quantitative chemical shifts among wild, domesticated, and cultured Cibotium barometz rhizomes, suggesting cultivation methods alter medicinal profiles.
Cibotium barometz (Gouji) is a widely prescribed traditional medicine whose supply still depends on wild-harvested rhizomes of this CITES-listed medicinal tree fern. We asked whether field domestication or tissue culture reproduces its chemical profile. Wild-collected (WP), field-domesticated (DM) and tissue-cultured (ZP) rhizomes (n = 3) were profiled by untargeted LC-MS/MS. Of 2828 annotated features, 2787 (98.6%) were detected in all three materials and fewer than ten were group-exclusive, indicating that differences are quantitative rather than qualitative, although this overlap partly reflects gap filling and detection limits. Replicate-level distances to the WP centroid were metric-dependent: correlation- and magnitude-based measures ranked DM closer (1 − Pearson 0.290 vs. 0.371), whereas abundance-weighted Bray–Curtis favoured ZP (0.398 vs. 0.459), consistent with PCA showing both substitutes displaced from WP along independent axes. Within nine literature-prioritized classes, ZP retained 93% of the WP response and an essentially identical organic-acid core (log2FC = −0.01), whereas DM retained 63%, losing organic acids, alkaloids, nucleosides and organosulfur compounds and gaining flavonoids and pterosins. N6-hydroxymethyladenosine, crotonoside and modified nucleosides are proposed as candidate authentication markers requiring validation with authentic standards. Chemical similarity alone does not establish therapeutic equivalence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: