What does this research mean for the field?

Integrated multi-pollutant control technologies and advanced sorbent materials provide a more cost-effective and operationally efficient alternative to traditional, individual pollutant treatment systems for industrial flue gas emissions. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.SYNTHESIS. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

What question did this study set out to answer?

Evaluate conventional and emerging technologies alongside advanced sorbent materials to identify effective, integrated approaches for the simultaneous removal of multiple gas-phase air pollutants from industrial flue gas.

August 30, 2026Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part AOpen Access

A review of technologies and sorbent materials for multi-pollutant gas removal

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

LKLawrence KoechTshwane University of Technology KPKasturie PremlallTshwane University of Technology DFDouw FaurieTshwane University of Technology

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Review evaluates integrated multi-pollutant technologies and advanced sorbents across industrial flue gas systems, highlighting pathways toward cost-effective simultaneous emission control.

Key Points

Evaluate conventional and emerging technologies alongside advanced sorbent materials to identify effective, integrated approaches for the simultaneous removal of multiple gas-phase air pollutants from industrial flue gas.
Synthesized technical evidence from laboratory to industrial-scale applications of wet and dry scrubbing, integrated treatment units, catalytic processes, and novel adsorption methods.
Compared major sorbent classes—including calcium-based, carbon-based, catalytic, zeolites, metal-organic frameworks, and nanomaterials—based on target pollutant combinations, operating temperatures, and regeneration performance.
Integrated multi-pollutant systems substantially lower capital costs, process complexity, and equipment footprints compared to conventional single-pollutant treatment trains.
Porous sorbents including metal-organic frameworks and zeolites demonstrate superior simultaneous removal efficiencies for complex gas streams, though thermal stability and scalable regeneration remain primary deployment constraints.

Cite This Study

Koech et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a93f0a36c1a8fb52e79cdf3 https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2026.2718789

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

August 30, 2026Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part AOpen Access

A review of technologies and sorbent materials for multi-pollutant gas removal

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

LKLawrence KoechTshwane University of Technology KPKasturie PremlallTshwane University of Technology DFDouw FaurieTshwane University of Technology

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Review evaluates integrated multi-pollutant technologies and advanced sorbents across industrial flue gas systems, highlighting pathways toward cost-effective simultaneous emission control.

Key Points

Evaluate conventional and emerging technologies alongside advanced sorbent materials to identify effective, integrated approaches for the simultaneous removal of multiple gas-phase air pollutants from industrial flue gas.
Synthesized technical evidence from laboratory to industrial-scale applications of wet and dry scrubbing, integrated treatment units, catalytic processes, and novel adsorption methods.
Compared major sorbent classes—including calcium-based, carbon-based, catalytic, zeolites, metal-organic frameworks, and nanomaterials—based on target pollutant combinations, operating temperatures, and regeneration performance.
Integrated multi-pollutant systems substantially lower capital costs, process complexity, and equipment footprints compared to conventional single-pollutant treatment trains.
Porous sorbents including metal-organic frameworks and zeolites demonstrate superior simultaneous removal efficiencies for complex gas streams, though thermal stability and scalable regeneration remain primary deployment constraints.

Cite This Study

Koech et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a93f0a36c1a8fb52e79cdf3 https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2026.2718789

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark