This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is a major atmospheric pollutant and also a recoverable nitrogen resource, for which adsorption offers a promising technical pathway. This review systematically summarizes the recent progress in the removal of NO2 from flue gas by adsorption methods, with a focus on material-level and process-level advancements. From the material perspective, three representative adsorbents—zeolites, activated carbons, and metal oxides—are comparatively evaluated in terms of their physicochemical properties, active sites, and adsorption mechanisms. Emphasis is placed on their adsorption capacity, selectivity, and hydrothermal stability, supported by both experimental and theoretical insights. From the process perspective, four adsorption-based technologies—Pressure Swing Adsorption (PSA), Temperature Swing Adsorption (TSA), Vacuum Pressure Swing Adsorption (VPSA), and Vacuum Temperature Swing Adsorption using multiple Gas circulations (GVTSA)—are analyzed regarding their principles, operational workflows, and engineering applications, with particular attention to the process intensification potential of GVTSA. The review identifies existing challenges in terms of material stability under complex conditions and process scalability, especially for severe environments such as nuclear reprocessing tail gases. Finally, future research directions are proposed toward developing multifunctional composite adsorbents with high capacity, strong environmental tolerance, and excellent regenerability, along with optimized and integrated adsorption processes, to achieve efficient NO2 abatement and high-value recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: