Prospective cohort study demonstrates that early frontal qEEG markers predict delayed cognitive recovery after mild-to-moderate ischemic stroke, highlighting targets for personalized rehabilitation.
Background and ObjectivePost-stroke cognitive impairment affects 30%-60% of survivors, yet predicting which patients will demonstrate delayed recovery remains challenging. We investigated whether early quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) markers can identify patients with cognitive recovery potential during the critical 3-6 month post-stroke period.MethodsThis prospective cohort study enrolled patients with first-time supratentorial ischemic stroke (NIHSS <15). Resting-state EEG was recorded at 8 ± 1 days post-stroke to calculate regional qEEG indices: peak alpha frequency (PAF), delta + theta/alpha + beta ratio (DTABR), and theta-alpha dominant frequency variability (DFV). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was administered at 3 and 6 months post-stroke. Cognitive recovery was defined as ≥2-point MoCA improvement. Stepwise logistic regression identified recovery predictors, with model performance evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).ResultsOf 96 enrolled patients, 53 (55.2%) demonstrated cognitive recovery, with substantial improvements in delayed recall/memory, naming, abstraction, and visuospatial/executive function. Patients with recovery showed lower cognitive performance at 3 months but reached comparable levels by 6 months post-stroke. Lower frontal PAF (adjusted OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.16, 0.47), reduced frontal DTABR (adjusted OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72, 0.96), and elevated frontal DFV (adjusted OR 4.59, 95% CI 1.27, 20.81) predicted cognitive recovery with good discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.831, 95% CI: 0.748, 0.914).ConclusionsEarly frontal qEEG measures identified stroke patients with delayed cognitive recovery potential during the 3-6 month window, despite initially poor performance. These findings suggest that early qEEG assessment could help inform personalized rehabilitation planning and identify candidates for extended cognitive rehabilitation interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: