Retrospective multicenter study demonstrates that low serum vitamin D predicts reduced relapse-free survival in resected stage II–III melanoma, indicating its role as a postoperative prognostic...
Objective: Vitamin D has been proposed as a potential prognostic biomarker in melanoma, but its significance in the postoperative setting remains unclear. This study investigated the association between baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels and relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with completely resected stage II–III cutaneous melanoma. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective multicenter study, 154 patients with resected cutaneous melanoma and available baseline serum 25(OH)D measurements obtained within 3 months before or after surgery were included. Patients were categorized as having low (≤20 ng/mL) or high (>20 ng/mL) vitamin D levels. Associations between clinicopathologic variables and vitamin D status were examined, and RFS was assessed using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: Of the 154 patients, 81 (58.5%) had low and 73 (41.5%) had high vitamin D levels. The median follow-up was 65 months, during which 67 relapse events occurred. Median RFS was 54.1 months (95% CI, 35.2–73.0) in the low vitamin D group and 89.2 months (95% CI, 68.3–110.2) in the high vitamin D group (p < 0.001). In univariable Cox analysis, stage III disease (HR, 3.30; 95% CI, 1.84–5.90; p < 0.001), absence of adjuvant therapy (HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.21–3.23; p = 0.006), low vitamin D level (HR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.59–4.51; p < 0.001), and higher Breslow thickness (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01–1.09; p = 0.048) were associated with poorer RFS. In multivariable analysis, stage III disease (HR, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.52–6.11; p = 0.002) and low vitamin D level (HR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.52–4.49; p < 0.001) remained independent predictors of inferior RFS. Conclusions: Baseline serum 25(OH)D was independently associated with RFS in resected stage II–III cutaneous melanoma. Lower vitamin D levels were linked to shorter RFS, suggesting that vitamin D status may provide complementary prognostic information in the postoperative setting. Prospective validation is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ekin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: