Cross-sectional study finds higher serum cotinine levels correlate with increased odds of depression in adults, suggesting a biological link between nicotine exposure and mental health.
Background: Evidence on the association between objective measures of tobacco exposure and depression remains limited. This study examined the relationship between serum cotinine and depression in a nationally representative U.S. population. Methods: Data were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2018. Serum cotinine was analyzed as a biomarker of nicotine exposure. Depression was defined as a Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score ≥10. Weighted logistic regression and restricted cubic spline models were used to assess linear and nonlinear associations. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also performed. Results: A total of 29,514 participants were included. Serum cotinine concentrations were positively associated with depression. Each one-unit increase in log-transformed cotinine was associated with higher odds of depression (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.06–1.09). Compared with the lowest tertile, participants in the highest tertile had increased odds of depression (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.45–2.04). Restricted cubic spline analysis indicated a linear association between log-transformed serum cotinine concentrations and depression after excluding participants with serum cotinine concentrations at the lower limit of detection. The association remained robust after additional adjustment for smoking status (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03–1.07) and subgroup analyses. Conclusions: Serum cotinine concentrations were positively associated with depression in a nationally representative U.S. population. These findings suggest a potential link between nicotine exposure and depression and underscore the importance of further investigating the relationship between tobacco exposure and mental health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: