Randomized trial reveals sustained reductions in knee abduction load in high-risk adolescent female soccer players after neuromuscular training, indicating durable protection against ACL injury.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate immediate and long-term (retention) improvements in knee abduction moment (KAM) following a neuromuscular training (NMT) program with augmented biofeedback in individuals at high and low risk for injury. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: One hundred fifty adolescent female soccer players were enrolled in a 6-week NMT program and randomized to biofeedback training groups: NMT+Hip-focus, NMT+Knee-focus, or NMT with a sham biofeedback. NMT was completed 3 times each week with augmented biofeedback delivered once per week. Standard 3D motion analysis of a drop vertical jump over artificial turf with embedded force platforms was performed at baseline (PRE), immediately following training (POST), and 6-months post-training (RET). Baseline measures of KAM were used to stratify participants into low- (n = 87, 12.7±2.2yrs, 153.0±11.4cm, 47.2±11.8kg) and high-risk (n = 44, 14.0±1.8yrs, 161.6±5.8cm, 53.5±9.2kg) groups, based on a previously determined cut point. A mixed-design ANOVA with between group factors of risk (High, Low) and training group (NMT+H, NMT+K, NMT), and a repeated within group factor of session (PRE, POST, RET) were used for the analysis. RESULTS: A significant interaction was identified between risk and session (p<0.001). Within training groups, the high-risk group had a significant reduction in KAM from baseline to post-test, and from baseline to 6-months (PRE: −37.5±9.0Nm, POST: −25.2±11.4Nm, RET: −29.4±14.5Nm). There were no changes in the low-risk group (PRE: −12.2±6.2Nm, POST: −12.2±7.6Nm, RET: −12.9±8.7Nm). CONCLUSION: Female soccer (football) players with knee biomechanics that put them at high risk for ACL injury had improved KAM following a NMT program. The changes in KAM remained at six months after training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taylor et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: