Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 30, 2026Communications MedicineOpen Access

Pooled two-cohort MRI body composition phenotyping with open-source deep learning

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

CMChristian MertensHHHartmut HäntzeSZSebastian Ziegelmayer

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Cohort study reveals distinct fat-distribution phenotypes for cardiometabolic disease in 45,851 adults, indicating that deep-learning MRI quantification adds value beyond body mass index.

Key Points

  • Determine whether a unified, open-source deep-learning tool can accurately quantify regional body composition and cardiometabolic disease risk across pooled multi-cohort MRI scans with varying acquisition protocols.
  • Applied MRSegmentator, an open-source nnU-Net pipeline, to quantify visceral, subcutaneous, and gluteofemoral adipose tissue, trunk muscle, and liver fat in 45,851 adults from the German National Cohort (n = 26,877, 3 T Siemens) and UK Biobank (n = 18,974, 1.5 T Siemens).
  • Trained a single pooled model on curated reference datasets without site-specific adaptations and evaluated inter-reader agreement using a separate 50-scan reader study.
  • Modeled associations between BMI-adjusted body composition compartments and cardiometabolic conditions using generalized linear mixed-effects models to assess incremental risk discrimination.
  • The pipeline achieved a mean Dice similarity coefficient of 0.91 in 5-fold cross-validation, with reader–reader Dice of 0.937 and algorithm–reader Dice of 0.908 across the 50-scan evaluation set.
  • Visceral adipose tissue displayed the strongest positive risk associations with cardiometabolic diseases, whereas gluteofemoral adipose tissue showed an inverse association, most prominently for type 2 diabetes (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.72).
  • Type 2 diabetes was specifically characterized by elevated visceral fat, reduced gluteofemoral fat, and increased liver fat, providing modest discrimination improvements over standard anthropometry.

Cite This Study

Mertens et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a93f1626c1a8fb52e79e4ffhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-026-01888-w
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share