Key result
Machine learning-derived, BMI-adjusted visceral adipose tissue was associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes (OR 1.49 per SD increase), while gluteofemoral adipose tissue conferred protection (OR 0.75).
Why the study?
The clinical implications of BMI-independent variation in fat distribution are not fully understood.
Are BMI-independent measures of local adiposity associated with cardiometabolic diseases in a large population cohort?
Observational (n=40,032)
Yes
Are BMI-independent measures of local adiposity associated with cardiometabolic diseases in a large population cohort?
Odds Ratio: 1.49 (95% CI 1.43–1.55)
Deep learning models can accurately quantify local adiposity from simplified MRI inputs, revealing that BMI-independent visceral fat increases cardiometabolic risk while gluteofemoral fat is protective.
Background The clinical implications of BMI-independent variation in fat distribution are not fully understood. Methods We studied MRI imaging data of 40,032 UK Biobank participants. Using previously quantified visceral (VAT), abdominal subcutaneous (ASAT), and gluteofemoral (GFAT) adipose tissue volume in up to 9,041 to train convolutional neural networks (CNNs), we quantified these depots in the remainder of the participants. We derived new metrics for each adipose depot – fully independent of BMI – by quantifying deviation from values predicted by BMI (e.g. VAT adjusted for BMI, VATadjBMI) and determined associations with cardiometabolic diseases. Results CNNs based on two-dimensional projection images enabled near-perfect estimation of VAT, ASAT, and GFAT, with r 2 in a holdout testing dataset (r 2 = 0.978-0.991). Using the newly derived measures of local adiposity – residualized based on BMI – we note marked heterogeneity in associations with cardiometabolic diseases. Taking presence of type 2 diabetes as an example, VATadjBMI was associated with significantly increased risk (odds ratio per standard deviation increase (OR/SD) 1.49; 95%CI: 1.43-1.55), while ASATadjBMI was largely neutral (OR/SD 1.08; 95%CI: 1.03-1.14) and GFATadjBMI conferred protection (OR/SD 0.75; 95%CI: 0.71-0.79). Similar patterns were observed for coronary artery disease. Conclusions Deep learning models trained on a simplified MRI input enable near perfect quantification of VAT, ASAT, and GFAT. For any given BMI, measures of local adiposity have variable and divergent associations with cardiometabolic diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agrawal et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Cardiometabolic diseases (Type 2 diabetes, Coronary artery disease) (n=40,032). BMI-adjusted visceral adipose tissue (VATadjBMI) vs. Lower levels of VATadjBMI (per standard deviation increase) was evaluated on Presence of type 2 diabetes (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.43-1.55). Machine learning-derived, BMI-adjusted visceral adipose tissue was associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes (OR 1.49 per SD increase), while gluteofemoral adipose tissue conferred protection (OR 0.75).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: