Key result
A low-sodium peritoneal dialysis solution did not show superiority over a standard-sodium solution for blood pressure control (response achieved in 34.5% vs 29.1%; p=0.51).
Why the study?
Patients on peritoneal dialysis often suffer from sodium and fluid overload and hypertension, and low-sodium dialysis solution might improve blood pressure management by increasing diffusive sodium removal.
Does a low-sodium peritoneal dialysis solution improve blood pressure response in hypertensive patients on peritoneal dialysis?
RCT (n=123)
Single-blind
randomised
Does a low-sodium peritoneal dialysis solution improve blood pressure response in hypertensive patients on peritoneal dialysis?
A once-daily low-sodium peritoneal dialysis solution did not significantly improve blood pressure control compared to standard solution and was associated with more hypotensive episodes.
Low-sodium PD solution offers no BP benefit and raises hypotension risk; challenges its use and supports standard solution in hypertensive PD patients.
Background: Patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) may suffer from sodium (Na) and fluid overload, hypertension and increased cardiovascular risk. Low-Na dialysis solution, by increasing the diffusive removal of Na, might improve blood pressure (BP) management. Methods: A glucose-compensated, low-Na PD solution (112 mmol/L Na and 2% glucose) was compared to a standard-Na solution (133 mmol/L Na and 1.5% glucose) in a prospective, randomised, single-blind study in hypertensive patients on PD. One daily exchange of the standard dialysis regimen was substituted by either of the study solutions for 6 months. The primary outcome (response) was defined as either a decrease of 24-h systolic BP (SBP) by ≥6 mmHg or a fall in BP requiring a medical intervention (e.g. a reduction of antihypertensive medication) at 8 weeks. Results: One hundred twenty-three patients were assessed for efficacy. Response criteria were achieved in 34.5% and 29.1% of patients using low- and standard-Na solutions, respectively ( p = 0.51). Small reductions in 24 h, office, and self-measured BP were observed, more marked with low-Na than with standard-Na solution, but only the between-group difference for self-measured SBP and diastolic BP was significant ( p = 0.002 and p = 0.003). Total body water decreased in the low-Na group and increased in the control group, but between-group differences were not significant. Hypotension and dizziness occurred in 27.0% and in 11.1% of patients in the low-Na group and in 16.9% and 4.6% in the control group, respectively. Conclusions: Superiority of low-Na PD solution over standard-Na solution for control of BP could not be shown. The once daily use of a low-Na PD solution was associated with more hypotensive episodes, suggesting the need to reassess the overall concept of how Na-reduced solutions might be incorporated within the treatment schedule.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davies et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Hypertension in peritoneal dialysis (n=123). Low-sodium peritoneal dialysis solution vs. Standard-sodium solution (133 mmol/L Na and 1.5% glucose) was evaluated on Decrease of 24-h systolic BP (SBP) by ≥6 mmHg or a fall in BP requiring a medical intervention at 8 weeks (p=0.51). A low-sodium peritoneal dialysis solution did not show superiority over a standard-sodium solution for blood pressure control (response achieved in 34.5% vs 29.1%; p=0.51).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: