Key result
Ilaprazole preserves clopidogrel exposure and platelet inhibition compared to pantoprazole.
Why the study?
Some PPIs inhibit CYP2C19 and potentially reduce clopidogrel activation, whereas ilaprazole is primarily metabolized via CYP3A4 and may offer reduced interaction.
Does ilaprazole preserve clopidogrel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics compared to pantoprazole or placebo in healthy male volunteers?
RCT (n=36)
Open-label
Randomized
Does ilaprazole preserve clopidogrel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics compared to pantoprazole or placebo in healthy male volunteers?
Effect estimate: GMR 1.23 (95% CI 0.97-1.55)
Absolute Event Rate: 10.18% vs 8.27%
Ilaprazole does not inhibit clopidogrel pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics, suggesting it may be a safer proton pump inhibitor alternative to pantoprazole for patients requiring dual antiplatelet therapy.
May favor ilaprazole over pantoprazole with clopidogrel; leaves open confirmation in outcome trials.
Clopidogrel is often co‐prescribed with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) to reduce gastrointestinal bleeding risk. However, some PPIs, especially pantoprazole, inhibit CYP2C19, potentially reducing clopidogrel's activation. Ilaprazole, a newer PPI primarily metabolized via CYP3A4, may offer reduced interaction. The study was an open‐label, randomized trial that involved 36 healthy male volunteers, who were divided into three groups (n = 12 each): Group 1 (Clopidogrel + Placebo), Group 2 (Clopidogrel + Pantoprazole 40 mg), and Group 3 (Clopidogrel + Ilaprazole 10 mg). After 7 days of treatment, all participants received clopidogrel 75 mg on Day 8. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were analyzed using LC‐MS/MS and platelet aggregation by light transmission aggregometry at 0, 4, 10, and 24 h. Pantoprazole significantly reduced clopidogrel AUC (1.96 ± 0.20 vs 8.27 ± 1.04 ng·h/mL, P < .0005), C max (0.76 ± 0.04 vs 2.6 ± 1.01 ng/mL, P = .0136), and t 1 / 2 (1.72 ± 0.11 vs 2.22 ± 0.17 h, P = .0312), indicating reduced bioavailability. Geometric mean ratio (GMR) analysis showed a marked reduction in clopidogrel exposure with pantoprazole (C max GMR 0.31, 90% CI 0.18–0.53; AUC GMR 0.24, 90% CI 0.19–0.29), and platelet aggregation was significantly higher at 4 and 10 h ( P < .05). In contrast, ilaprazole preserved PK parameters (AUC 10.18 ± 1.41, C max 3.06 ± 1.05), GMRs near unity (C max 1.20, 90% CI 0.60–2.42; AUC 1.23, 90% CI 0.97–1.55), indicating no inhibitory effect and platelet inhibition comparable to placebo ( P > .05) Ilaprazole did not affect clopidogrel pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics, suggesting it as a safer alternative to pantoprazole in dual antiplatelet therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
N et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Healthy volunteers (n=36). Ilaprazole vs. Placebo was evaluated on Clopidogrel AUC (ng·h/mL) (GMR 1.23, 95% CI 0.97-1.55). Ilaprazole co-administered with clopidogrel preserved clopidogrel exposure (AUC GMR 1.23; 90% CI 0.97-1.55) and platelet inhibition, whereas pantoprazole significantly reduced bioavailability.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: