This article reviews research bearing on the theoretical foundations of code-oriented versus whole-language approaches to reading instruction, with a focus on the following issues : (a) the role played by word identification in reading ; (b) the weight accorded context in word identification ; and (c) the respective roles played by alphabetic coding and phoneme awaresness in learning to read. These are directly addressed in studies reported in this issue (December 1991) of the Journal of Educational Psychology, and their results extend or qualify previous findings. The evidence, on balance, favors the major theoretical premises on which code-emphasis approaches to reading instruction are based and is at variance with the major theoretical premises on which whole-language approaches are based. However, the findings do not preclude the compatibility of certain features of both approaches
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frank R. Vellutino (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: