Key result
Intravenous administration of nifedipine (10 µg/kg), verapamil (50-150 µg/kg), or propranolol (240 µg/kg) consistently abolished picrotoxin-induced centrogenic arrhythmias in cats.
Why the study?
Do calcium-channel blockers or beta-blockers suppress picrotoxin-induced centrogenic arrhythmias in cats?
Do calcium-channel blockers or beta-blockers suppress picrotoxin-induced centrogenic arrhythmias in cats?
Calcium-channel blockers and beta-blockers effectively abolish picrotoxin-induced centrogenic arrhythmias in cats, suggesting potential utility for neurogenic arrhythmias.
May support investigation of calcium-channel blockers or beta-blockers for neurogenic arrhythmias; leaves open translation from feline model to humans.
Intravenous picrotoxin injection has been established as a model of producing arrhythmias, mainly through enhanced central sympathetic outflow. The effects of calcium-channel blockers, and a beta-blocker on these arrhythmias were tested in chloralose-anesthetized cats. Picrotoxin (10 mg/kg, i.v.) produced mostly ventricular, sometimes supraventricular tachycardias and ectopic beats, as well as a marked elevation of arterial blood pressure. Nifedipine at the doses of 2 micrograms/kg (i.v. or i.c.) and 5 micrograms/kg (i.v.) transiently suppressed the arrhythmias in some of the cats tested. With the dose of 10 micrograms/kg (i.v.), it promptly and consistently abolished the arrhythmias without recurrence and significantly reduced the blood pressure (-62 +/- 8/-59 +/- 8 mmHg, delta systolic pressure/delta diastolic pressure, p less than 0.001, n = 9). A similar degree of blood pressure reduction (-69 +/- 8/-67 +/- 7 mmHg, n = 6) after sodium nitroprusside (4-5 mg/kg, i.v.) injection abolished the arrhythmias in 4 of 6 cats; however, there was marked ECG evidence of myocardial ischemia in 3 cats. Verapamil (50 micrograms/kg, i.v.) transiently abolished the arrhythmias and significantly decreased the blood pressure (7/7 cats), whereas a larger dose (150 micrograms/kg) had a persistent effect (2/4 cats). Propranolol at a dose of 240 micrograms/kg also consistently abolished the arrhythmias without recurrence in all 4 cats. We conclude that nifedipine, verapamil and propranolol are effective in the treatment of picrotoxin-induced arrhythmias. This result indicates that calcium-channel blockers or beta-blockers may be clinically effective in the treatment or prevention of arrhythmias caused by intracranial lesions with enhanced sympathetic outflow.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hou et al. (1988) studied Picrotoxin-induced centrogenic arrhythmias (n=72). Nifedipine, Verapamil, and Propranolol vs. Baseline / No treatment was evaluated on Abolition of arrhythmias and reduction in blood pressure (p=<0.001). Intravenous administration of nifedipine (10 µg/kg), verapamil (50-150 µg/kg), or propranolol (240 µg/kg) consistently abolished picrotoxin-induced centrogenic arrhythmias in cats.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: