Key result
Combining the standard deviation of normal RR intervals and feet electrochemical skin conductance predicted cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy with an AUC of 0.779, a sensitivity of 79.4%, and a specificity of 70%.
Why the study?
Although heart rate variability or electrochemical skin conductance alone can screen for cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy, whether combining both quantitative approaches reinforces screening accuracy and improves severity estimation in type 2 diabetes was tested.
Does combining heart rate variability (SDNN) and electrochemical skin conductance (feet ESC) improve the screening and severity evaluation of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Cross-Sectional (n=90)
No
Does combining heart rate variability (SDNN) and electrochemical skin conductance (feet ESC) improve the screening and severity evaluation of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.779 (95% CI 0.68-0.88)
p-value: p=<0.001
Combining heart rate variability (SDNN) and electrochemical skin conductance (feet ESC) provides a feasible, time-effective, and objective screening tool for detecting and evaluating the severity of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Combining HRV and ESC may aid CAN screening in T2DM; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Clinical studies show that either heart rate variability (HRV) or electrochemical skin conductance (ESC) alone can serve as a simple and objective method for screening cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN). We tested the hypothesis that combining these two quantitative approaches can not only reinforce accuracy in CAN screening but also provide a better estimate of CAN severity in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) who had already had CAN in outpatient clinics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each patient received a complete battery of cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests (CARTs), with ESC measured by SUDOSCAN, time domain of HRV measured by standard deviation of all normal RR intervals (SDNN) and frequency domain of HRV (low frequency [LF], high frequency [HF], and LF/HF ratio), and peripheral blood studies for vascular risk factors. Severity of CAN was measured by CAN score. RESULTS: The 90 T2DM patients included 50 males and 40 females. Those with more severe CAN had lower values in feet ESC (P = 0.023) and SDNN (P < 0.0001). Multiple linear regression analysis also showed that feet ESC and SDNN value (P = 0.003 and P < 0.0001) were significantly associated with CAN score. Combining SDNN and feet ESC also can increase the diagnostic accuracy of CAN with respective to sensitivity and specificity by using receiver operating characteristic analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Combining the results of SDNN and feet ESC can not only assess, but also quantitatively reflect the progress or improvement of autonomic nerve function (including sympathetic and parasympathetic activity) in patients with T2DM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lai et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 diabetes with cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (n=90). Combination of heart rate variability (SDNN) and electrochemical skin conductance (feet ESC) was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (AUC) for predicting cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (AUC 0.779, 95% CI 0.68-0.88, p=<0.001). Combining the standard deviation of normal RR intervals and feet electrochemical skin conductance predicted cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy with an AUC of 0.779, a sensitivity of 79.4%, and a specificity of 70%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: